Notes of a Bobby Watcher XIV

Is he a population thinner?

So are we dealing with someone who wants to thin the population?

The situation Is worsening. Secretary Kennedy continues to exercise his dark misunderstanding of what it means to oversee our nation’s health. Because of his deep gloomy belief that vaccines are harmful, he is on a march to destroy lives.

I wonder if he might be a eugenicist, hell bent on cleansing the population of those he deems unworthy or not like him (whatever that is).

He does not identify as a eugenicist. But . . . .

Let’s look at the eugenics movement (early 1900s). Eugenics is defined as the use of selective breeding to improve humanity. The main principle behind the early movement was the assumption that all human characteristics are borne of simple inheritance.

This assumption led to the widespread belief that desirable traits should be selected. This was encouraged and celebrated through “fitter family” and “better baby” competitions, where judges rated families and children like people would rate livestock or pets at shows.

The eugenics movement sought to eliminate undesirable traits in society — sometimes forcibly sterilizing people ---- the feebleminded, moral degenerates, mental defectives and habitual criminals ---- with unwanted characteristics to prevent their contribution to the gene pool.

These criteria were vague and often biased against marginalized groups such as immigrants, people with disabilities, and the poor.

The eugenics movement was rife with societal bias that defined which attributes made the best individual. In each country where eugenics was practiced, those biases colored a broad range of what was considered genetically ideal.

Let’s look at The Secretary.

1. RFK Jr. has signaled his fidelity to eugenics by suggesting that people with autism are nonfunctional members of society, a claim that echoes the 1920 essay “Permitting the Destruction of Life Unworthy of Life’”

2. He plans to establish a registry of autistic people and deliver sensitive medical data about autistic people to researchers. this strongly suggests eugenics, defining autistic people as burdens who need to be cured and prevented.

WOW

3. He proposes wellness farms for young people with substance abuse and mental health issues.

FARMS?

4. His rhetoric about autistic people being nonfunctional and his policy proposals reflect thinking that devalues the lives of disabled people.

Kinda sounds like eugenics to me

5. Kennedy called autism an epidemic and made statements such as “Autism destroys families,” “These are kids who will never pay taxes. They’ll never hold a job.”

WOW. Have you looked recently, Mr. Secretary?

Now let’s look further at his anti-vaxxer stance to see who are the most affected.

This is well documented.

The poor are disproportionately affected when vaccines are not available. The evidence shows clear patterns of vaccine inequity that particularly harm low-income populations. Those in the poor income group had 55% lower odds of being vaccinated for COVID-19 compared to high-income groups.

Globally, just over 3% of people in low-income countries had been vaccinated with at least one dose, compared to 60% per cent in high-income countries.

Low-income populations face multiple barriers that make vaccine access more difficult, including, but not limited to:

· access to health care services, particularly in rural areas

· limited ability to travel to care

· high health care costs

· misinformation (This is a HUGE part of the Secretary’s persona . . . a disingenuous liar

So, is his anti-vaxxer stance meant to define a different society, one with fewer poor?

Is this eugenics? Does The Secretary of OUR Health, Education and Welfare condone this for devious reasons that fall under the rubric of eugenics.

You watch. You decide.

Copyright 2025